19 September, 2022

Abusive Authority Strikes Again

A good friend of mine is locked up in a Texas prison. For years, he taught other inmates, a position he left voluntarily in part because of the power plays and politics revolving around such a seemingly cushy position. Instead, he volunteered himself to work in wastewater—literally scraping shit off a metal grate to keep the archaic sewer system flowing, not to mention the dozens of other tasks required.

He liked this job, even though its hours were brutal: 7 days a week, 365 days a year, for 12-18 hours per day. On the plus side, he was left mostly on his own, out of the Building, with a crumbling, antebellum shack he turned into a haven: he planted a garden; he adopted cats and protected them from the wrath of guards, inmates, and crocodiles alike. He spent the hours reading, teaching himself German, and listening to football on his radio through the speaker he built from headphones and the end of a soda can.

He learned the system he was responsible for maintaining better than the “professionals” the state sent to make needed repairs. He often found himself having to correct them, to inform them they had not fixed what was broken; or the process they were about to undertake would cause the system to flood instead of function. He was routinely ignored, of course—who the fuck are you to tell me what to do?

I hadn’t heard from my friend in almost two weeks. When someone you care about is incarcerated, you learn to get used to suspenseful silences of varying lengths. Most likely, they’re on lockdown. Maybe he caught chain, sent across the state with no notice and no explanation.

So when my phone rang late the other night, I was excited to see the name of the company through which all inmate calls are routed. As soon as I picked it up, my phone died. God dammit! I raced for my backup handset, and it was dead, too. By the time my phone rang again the next morning, I was ready.

“Are you OK?” I asked immediately. “Were you on lockdown?”

“No,” he began. “It was so much worse.”

He had been at work, 24 hours a day, alone, for 4 and a half days. He had received 2 sack lunches, consisting solely of cold pancake sandwiches, on the days he was lucky. Every time he went to the front to let the supervisor know he was still there, and still hadn’t been fed, and still needed help, he was told to leave. He was told she was the boss, and who did he think he was to tell her what was needed. He was told if he came back one more time, she would initiate a case against him (which would go on his record and could harm his chances at parole).

The breaking point, he said, was when he finally received yet another sack lunch, covered in dirt, the inside of which was swarmed with ants.

“What the fuck is this?” he asked the man who was tasked with delivering this relief.

“You wanted to eat, right?”

“I’m not eating that shit!” my friend replied, and thrust the bag away.

He went back out front.

He told the lady to write him up if she wanted, but he was quitting his job, and the warden could come talk to him if he wanted, but he was done.

After some back and forth, a Sergeant came out. The Sergeant told my friend that he doesn’t tell them when he quits his job, or when he eats, or when he gets to go back to his unit. My friend informed the Sergeant that was exactly what he was doing.

Do you know who the fuck I am? the Sergeant replied.

“I don’t give a fuck who you are,” my friend shot back.

“Put your hands behind your back,” he was ordered.

And he did.

Luckily, all of this occurred in a very public place, and another staff member familiar with the situation intervened. I both admire and fear the force of my friend’s personality. He takes shit from no one, will not be spoken to or treated as less than he is. It is both a survival strategy in an eminently hostile environment and a predictor of conflict he does not need. He has gotten much better at what he does and does not respond to, but still…sometimes it scares me.

“I was exhausted,” he explained. “I was out there working that whole time, with barely any food, shit I wouldn’t eat if it wasn’t the only thing I had, that barely gets you by sitting on your ass in the Building. I’ve been doing all the shit I’m supposed to do, on my fucking own, for both shifts, with no break, for days. I’m not going back.”

Nor should he.

He tried to recommend other dudes for the open positions—one person to work days (my friend), one person to work nights (left on parole), and someone for him to train to step in either shift for extra help or when the next guy leaves (strung out and useless). He tried to recommend people he knew had a good work ethic, or who could be taught and he thought needed a brother figure, or at least weren’t constantly high or willing to risk everyone’s futures for their own impulsive needs.

But the person in authority saw this as my friend just trying to control shit, to undermine her authority, or to concoct some dastardly scheme whilst raking feces and fixing hoses. I know it is prison, and I know suspicion is warranted, but all of these responses are about petty ego bullshit and the exertion of authority for its own sake.

I fear for the ramifications, or just straight retaliation, my friend might face as a result of committing the ultimate crime against abusive authority—being in the right, and knowing it, and saying so, then PROVING it, and where everyone can witness. He proves the lie to their claims, demonstrates the absurdity of their leverage, and publicly humiliates them.

Abusive authority responds to such situations as to a hostile attack, encircles the source of disturbance, then turns that authority into a weapon. I’ve been struggling with this myself as of late, though in entirely different forms and circumstances. But it is a parallel emotional journey, something my friend and I share in numerous ways.

He mentioned this to me, once he finished telling me what had happened. I’d recently sent him a letter, a long deep-dive into my personal crises that I don’t want to over-burden him with on the phone, something I almost did not send, feeling suddenly selfish and thoughtless for dumping so much of my shit on him. He urged me to send it, so I did, and he finally received it when he got back to his bunk after the week of hell he’d endured, and he read it through and thought about it and called me in the morning and discussed it with me.

Because he is a good friend. Because he is a good man.

He has not let the repeated abuses, the daily degradation, and the threat of violence alter his fundamental character. He could have done prison the “easy” way—he could have turned his physical, intellectual, and charismatic forces to manipulate, intimidate, and bully his way to get what he wants, as many of his peers do. But that is not who he is.

I admire him for this, and I aspire to take the lessons from his struggles to heart. If he can endure, and improve as a person, and carry his head high in a system as septic as the job he so recently relinquished, then, dammit, so can I.

12 August, 2017

"Devotional"

"Devotional"

I am a bird in flight
before it swoops on prey unsuspecting
squealing for mothers brothers friends—
too late. You are mine.

I sprout from the vine and
hide in pink blossoms, resplendent
and slick with dew to draw you near—
too late. I devour.

I am the weapon wielded, well-
hidden to lull daggers in the dark.
Surrender, or your knife will never leave
its sheath again.

You sat and trembled while
cities and empires ground to dust,
more afraid of my holy relics than
the Barbarians at the gates.

For all your ages of
impotent oppression, we
dwellers within unfurl our longly-lusted
majesty. I seize, a savage groan, and
yield myself.

I am the smitten, ascendant
beneath your hymns—sing to me,
worship and woo my perfumed veil, and
I am yours.

20 May, 2017

Dealing in Democracy—The Consequences of Not Voting

[Dealing in Democracy grasps at, wrestles with, questions, critiques, and explores mere tinges of the brittle and broken bones of American politics through my admittedly biased eyes and offers me an outlet through which to fumigate the horrors both presently presenting and ever-present.]

-=: I originally wrote this right after the election, but got caught up with school or writing something else and so left it unpublished. Cornell West, on Bill Maher the other night, tried to argue that voting for Clinton was almost as bad as voting for Trump, and so reminded me of this argument I kept pressing on people torn over their votes. Since the cult of the individual still reigns mighty in the USA, it is still very relevant, and so here it is.:=-


18 May, 2017

Verse—"Bedtime Rituals"

"Bedtime Rituals"

You put a leg in your pajamas, NO—.
First (as things go) you must
divest that leg of previous attire, and
the other, and arms, too, and belly/neck/
chest—to prepare for pajamafication.
But why? Do dreams have a dress code? Does
sleep come quicker to the clothed? I confess
to scant preparations for sleeping, as such, just
what I was already wearing or some
soft cotton shift or nothing at all, but
the ritual changing-of-the-clothes is a con-
cept completely lost on the likes of me. On
my dislikes, too.

Perhaps it is closer to a custom—some-
thing you do because it is something
you do—or propriety—something you
do because if you don't, people or God or
whoever blah blah will think etc. It is
probably much more mundane, about
laundry or the likelihood of lice, which
not at all alters my perception of the
present—pointless.

23 February, 2017

The Regurgitated—Why Everyone Wants to Strangle a Book Purist

[The Regurgitated is...exactly that.]

-= #NOONEUNDERSTAAAAANDS=-

This story is a tragedy, made more tragic still by all the warning signs present, the ready explanations, the reason and forethought and practical common sense so readily, so easily apparent and available for counsel. And yet, our Lady Claire of House Williams—Denier of Sense and Photoshopper of Shite, chose instead to follow her heart, a heart that wailed at such length and at such a volume that even David and Dan could hear her despair from the deepest of the seven pits in the lowest of the seven hells:


WhhhhhhhhHHHHHYYYYYYYYYY don't the FUCKING TARGARYNS have VIOLET fucking EYES on the SHOW? WhhHHHHYYYYYY?????????????? It's an INTEGRAL PART of their FUCKING CHARACTERS, you mmmmaaaaAAAANNNIIIIAAACCCASS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let me explain. 

So I accidentally clicked on one of those "sponsored content" click-bait links, and on the buffet of desperate acts seeking ad revenue I found this gem:

How the cast of Game of Thrones should really look by one Claire Williams. It lists 35 (!!) characters from the story, describes their show character, and points out the various "problems' the show suffers by not paying close enough attention to the text when deciding dye color formulas and prosthetic makeup. There is then a description of each as quoted by GRRM, a "rating" system, and sort of before and after photos: the first shows an actor in character from the show, and the second is photoshopped with the changes she thinks are necessary to fall in line with the books.

I hate things like this for a number of reasons, first and foremost being a complete inability to grasp that movies and television do not exist simply to make illustrations of books and stories. It fails to comprehend that written stories have strengths and weaknesses that are different from a visual representation, and the two must thus access vital components for themselves. Lady Claire of House Williams may think that, because television is a visual medium, it should get the visual stuff "right," which leads me to my next point.

Perhaps more important is the presumption of descriptions of appearance as the purest way to judge likeness of character, and anyone who has ever known another person, ever, knows this is not the case. There are times in this list when Lady Claire admits so-and-so's characterization is spot-on, but the problem is that he really has longer hair in hue closer to copper than blood. The real problem is thinking that is the real problem.

Which leads me to this little project. This list is so offensive to my sensibilities of writing, story, character, open-mindedness, and not being a quibbling fistula that action must be taken. It is the annoying humorlessness of book purists like this—the grotesque elitism—that has caused some people I know to swear off the reading of these books entirely. A grievous sin, indeed.

I do not know this Lady Claire of House Williams, by the way, and toward her I bear no animosity. This is just my way of coping with Things that Bug the Shit Out of Me on the Internet. All photos are as-is from the list itself. So here is my answer to "How the cast of Game of Thrones should really look" with "How Game of Thrones fans should really sound," replicated in style and spirit, fully attributed to the author. The title graphics, for better or worse, are my own.


20 January, 2017

The Regurgitated—Guns-n-Balls-n-Inaugurations, oh my!

[The Regurgitated is...exactly that.]

-= “I’m a white male who owns firearms. At least for the next four years I get to keep my guns and my balls.”=-

That was Richard Pease, a 53 year-old executive from New Hampshire, quoted in this article from the Guardian about the inauguration. Mr. Pease is also a shining example of the fact that if you repeat favorite lies to yourself over and over again, you're in no danger of recognizing reality or common sense. 

Mr. Pease, on behalf of bleeding-heart liberals everywhere. allow me to apologize for all those times we outlawed and then confiscated your firearms. Remember that? Especially that one time when it has never fucking happened? Sigh, alas, O' me. 

According to the logic of those two statements, he lost his balls when he was oppressed by society for being a white male, now widely recognized as great sufferers of discrimination imposed by all those women and brown people. But Mr. Pease read right through all those elitist calls for "equality" and "opportunity." His white scrotum has been sidelined for too long! We now have a president who boasts of sexual assault on camera! Who calls out Mexicans for what they really are! Who finally recognizes all Muslims are terrorists!

I mean, think about it. We now finally have a president who doesn't sit around and wait for reality and data and science and experience to tell him what the truth is. Our president jumps boldly into the Twitterverse and decides on what truth is by himself. That's so damn American it probably completely voids the selection of the most un-populist cabinet say, ever, and they probably just mean the cabinet by Trump's bed where he keeps Hillary Clinton's uterus encased in Kryptonite and guarded by a battalion Trucknuts modeled from life, all self-portraits. I've heard the real set were used as security on the loans that financed his casino bankruptcy. 

Seriously. Fucking genius.  


26 December, 2016

The Digest—Tuesday-Monday, 20-26 December, 2016

[The Digest is a collection of articles, videos, and other media I've viewed and found significant throughout the day. It is a way to divest myself from other social media that is more reliant on likes, click-bait, and peer-approval rather than quality, intelligence, and diversity of opinion, which are the qualities I find important. It is also a way to devote myself to daily contributions to this space...at least in theory.]

-=Summary: Bill O'Reilly's "white establishment," that white establishment in action, romcoms and stalking myths, Trump demanding info on "women's programs," lead exposure and criminality, time management, Trump's nukes, losing democracy in North Carolina, Twitter freaks over interracial ad, counterproductive voting, and the climate denial of Trumpism=-


Yes, I fell behind again, so I'm condensing since I have all these tabs open on my browser and don't remember when I read what and I'm more likely to publish this in one than write 4 more. I blame insomnia combined with homework to ignore my tendency toward procrastination and childish, I don't feel like it! inner demons. And I'm basically writing this to myself since I have 1 whole subscriber (hi there!) which I'm not even sure isn't myself. 


Commence

Articles:

CNN pundit likens O'Reilly's race comments to apartheid rhetoric

Leinz Vales from CNN

I'm not shocked O'Reilly said these things. Example:
"The left wants power taken away from the white establishment," O'Reilly said.
I am surprised that O'Reilly would be so brutally honest on national television. This has been the largely unsaid, though sometimes screamed, subtext of Trump's whole...Trumpiness for a year and a half. 

Bakari Sellers states:
"We have to talk about the simple fact that, African-Americans, we don't want anything from white people. It's not as if we want to take something from white nationalists, or take something from white supremacists."
This makes sense, of course, but what Sellers either does not mention or does not understand is that, to the O'Reilleys and Trumps and Richard Spencers of the world, just claiming equality of opportunity and education and employment is itself a taking-away from these jackknobs. What does it take away? The superiority of vantage, the edge, the privilege they feel entitled to by virtue of white birth. 

So, props to Bill O'Reilly for his honesty. It's despicable and hateful and hideous, but they've been dancing around this for so long, it's a relief to see it laid bare for the world to see.

20 December, 2016

The Digest—Tuesday, 20 December, 2016

[The Digest is a collection of articles, videos, and other media I've viewed and found significant throughout the day. It is a way to divest myself from other social media that is more reliant on likes, click-bait, and peer-approval rather than quality, intelligence, and diversity of opinion, which are the qualities I find important. It is also a way to devote myself to daily contributions to this space...at least in theory.]

-=Summary: Anti-cat propaganda & Richard Spencer, fame whore doucherag extraordinaire=-

Articles:

'Mysterious power over humanity': How cats affect health
Alice Robb from CNN

Apparently the author and the expert in this are both cat people, or at least the "expert," but they're both pretty negative about cats, and this almost reads as anti-cat propaganda. 
They're a disaster for the environment: One conservancy organization has called cats the "ecological axis of evil." 
...seriously?
Nearly half of house cats have physically attacked their owners.
But nearly all of these attacks result in, at worst, superficial scratches. Cats are not dogs that can maul you to death, unless you're an idiot who keeps a panther in a 10' cage and is then surprised when it takes a swipe at you.

Discussing reasons for domestication, the expert states:
We also tended toward animals that had social hierarchies that we could dominate. Dogs and cattle have lead animals, and we can control them by acting the alpha dog or the lead steer. But cats are solitary animals that don't have social hierarchies. They're hard to physically control, and they don't tolerate confinement well.
First of all, I think cats domesticated humans, not the other way around, but this person speaks as though the only reason to interact with an animal is to control it to perform some laborious task. I don't want to dominate my cat. I don't want to control her. I marvel at her world of 1 that is occasionally eclipsed to allow me in its presence. 

This is the reason she gives for us accepting cats in our lives.
Cats have big round eyes located right in the middle of their faces, because they're ambush predators and need good binocular vision. They have little noses, because they don't hunt by smell. They have round faces because they have short, powerful jaws. This set of features, which is actually just an expression of the way the cat hunts, looks to us like our infants.
Again...seriously? I agree we tend to show more affection for animals that remind us more of ourselves, as we're species self-obsessed, but she says more in a bit that confirms why this statement drives me nuts. I'll quote it here:
There are some interesting ideas from evolutionary psychologists -- that a woman might use a cat to hone her parenting skills or, before having kids, to demonstrate her fitness as a mate.
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuccckkk yooooouuuuuu.
People who have cats are less likely to be outside in the world, walking their cats, meeting other people in cat parks. And cats may not be as good a substitute for human companionship as other kinds of pets. Dogs and their owners have this lovely synergy -- they gaze into each other's eyes, and both of them have this flow of oxytocin going.
Maybe your cat doesn't like you very much? Very frequently, when my cat comes for cuddles and pets, she demands I stare into her eyes. She will even reach up with her paws and try to turn my head to force me to do so. Eye contact is very important to her, and then there's all the squinty-face and nuzzles and other overt expressions of affection this person apparently lacks.

And no, I don't walk my cat because cats are not servile little imbeciles you can put on a leash and drag around wherever you want. Cats do what they want, which is why I think so many people do not like them.
Somebody who is socially isolated to begin with, or unable to do the rigorous care that a dog needs, might be more likely to get a cat -- but having a cat can be isolating in and of itself.
Cats don't require rigorous care? I've tried 10 flavors of food this month for my cat. I'm not incapable of taking my cat outside to relieve herself, but she doesn't need me to do that. Instead of preferring more independent creatures, we're "unable to do the rigorous care," yet somehow use this as practice for having kids. As I said, this is a self-described "cat person." And then there's this:
From my experience drifting around the cat world, it does seem to be more of a female-centric passion. The simple, slightly sexist explanation is that cats' infantile-looking features prey particularly on female instincts.
And then, about cats living with humans:
There's evidence that to prevent cat-human violence, we need to go to more extreme lengths than I'd ever thought. Experts say that you need to give an entire room of your house for the cat's exclusive use. That you should make sure the cat has multiple litter boxes, one per floor, and extra ones for extra cats. That you should never rearrange your furniture. That you should try not to wear perfume. That houseguests are freaky for your cat.
Oh give me a freakin' break. Yes, some lunatics might go to these extremes, but, as is mentioned earlier in the article, cats are incredibly adaptable. Yes, moving stressed out my cat, but now she's happy as a fuzzball can be curled in her bed in front of the fireplace. She has also never attacked me. The only cat I had who attacked was formerly feral, incredibly traumatized, and only attacked in response to unwanted touching by me. She never ambushed me or scratched/bit unprovoked, and she was the most violent cat I've ever had. "Attacks" are also often expressions of play from cats, as with many other mammmals, as play-fighting is how they learn fighting skills for later life. 

I know some cats do "attack" their humans, but just like all people don't get along, I think some cats just don't like some people. They choose who to spend their time with. They don't care who feeds them, who changes their litter; if they don't like you, it doesn't matter what you do for them. Some people don't like cats because they view this as disloyalty. They want the unconditional love of a creature absolutely dependent on them for survival. 

I think it's about control and self-validation. If this is what you need from an animal, a cat who doesn't come when you call or respond with affection to every touch or sometimes doesn't want to be touched at all must be wounding to the ego—I can't force this creature to love me! Whaaa!

That's one of the things I love most about cats—they are individuals, their own masters, and if you kick them out (you evil bastard!), they can make it on their own. Their instincts persist. But when they do come to you for touch and affection and pull your glasses off your face trying to get you to gaze endlessly into their eyes while they drool and purr and fall into that half-sleeping squint and then you go back to what you were doing and OH NO YOU DON'T WHO GAVE YOU PERMISSION TO LOOK AWAY fuck there go my glasses again. So precious!


19 December, 2016

The Digest—Monday, 19 December, 2016

[The Digest is a collection of articles, videos, and other media I've viewed and found significant throughout the day. It is a way to divest myself from other social media that is more reliant on likes, click-bait, and peer-approval rather than quality, intelligence, and diversity of opinion, which are the qualities I find important. It is also a way to devote myself to daily contributions to this space...at least in theory.]

-=Summary: Francine Prose on the evaporation of truth, "White Supremacy Is Not an Illness." more evidence that voter fraud is a myth, Paul Krugman finally recognizes the signs from Ancient Rome, the Not Normal, Trump's likelihood of outsourcing intelligence gathering to the peril of all, Trump's press attacks giving journalism much-needed aid, New Jersey's governmental attempts to censor journalism, Ben Carson is the worst person to run HUD=-

So I missed the last few days in an insomnia-induced stupor wherein I hallucinated a bic lighter as a pepperoni stick (and tried to eat it) and awoke abruptly pouring coffee into my lap. Yes, I'm quite a catch!

But I'm back...with a mutha-flippin' vengeance!

Articles:

Truth is evaporating before our eyes
Francine Prose from The Guardian

I love Francine Prose, and there are so many crucial points in this article I feel compelled to quote it at length. 
More recently, Newt Gingrich, among others, has been informing us that facts and statistics no longer count so much as feelings, suspicions, prejudices and anecdotal evidence. The fact that violent crime is down, Gingrich explained on CNN, is of less import than the fact that “people feel more threatened. Liberals have a whole set of statistics which theoretically may be right but are not how human beings are. As a political candidate, I’ll go with how people feel, and I’ll let you go with theoreticians.”  
This is a major crux of the problem. "Liberals have a whole set of statistics which theoretically may be right but..." WHAT?! Oh, you silly liberals and your SCIENCE. That they so flagrantly admit manipulating people's feelings and then bank on those feelings instead of evil liberal facts is testament to just how much people don't care that they're being manipulated. The GOP has been saying, quite openly and for quite some time, that they're lying about a bunch of stuff, that the truth is irrelevant, and because of their emotional manipulation those that support them still consider the left less trustworthy. Perhaps "trust" has nothing to do with honesty anymore. 
As a consequence, we have begun to hear that we are living in a post-truth era, a period in which (to paraphrase Gingrich) those in power get to decide what is true and what isn’t. When, just before the election, a friend in upstate New York confronted a neighbor with evidence of Donald Trump’s misdeeds, her neighbor’s only response was: “That depends on where you get your facts.” 
This is partly the fault of the media who bought into the accusations of their "liberal bias," and in eating that bullshit-pie determined to be "fair" by treating opinion as equal to fact, promoting years of false equivalency that culminated in one presendential candidate's videotaped admissions to nonconsensually grabbing women by their genitals as of equal importance and scandal to the other candidate's use of a private email server. Supporters of the pussy-grabber changed LOCK HER UP! while the concept of prosecution or imprisonment for the man with lines of women accusing him of sexual assault was "politically incorrect." That's not politically incorrect; that's criminal.  
It’s dismaying to see how accurately George Orwell’s 1943 essay on the Spanish civil war predicted the present moment. Orwell feared “that the concept of objective truth is fading out of the world … I am willing to believe that history is for the most part inaccurate and biased, but what is peculiar to our own age is the abandonment of the idea that history could be truthfully written. In the past people deliberately lied, or unconsciously colored what they wrote, or they struggled after the truth … but in each case they believed that ‘facts’ existed and were more or less discoverable.  
“Nazi theory indeed specifically denies that such a thing as ‘the truth’ exists … The implied objective of this line of thought is a nightmare world in which the Leader, or some ruling clique, controls not only the future but the past. If the Leader says of such and such an event, ‘It never happened’ – well, it never happened. If he says that two and two are five – well, two and two are five.” 
Climate change is a hoax perpetrated by China. Millions of illegal immigrants voted for Hillary Clinton. This is the biggest electoral landslide in history. No one respects women more than I do. I know more than the generals. Obama was born in Kenya. Obama is the founder of ISIS. Unemployment is way up. Mexico sends us their rapists. Crime is way up. You can't walk down the street in America's inner cities without getting shot. "The number of murders in our country is the highest it's been in 45 years." The election is rigged unless I win. I'm an outsider. I'll cut taxes most for the middle class. My hands are perfectly normal. I know the best words. I love Hispanics. The jobs report is a lie. The unemployment report is a lie. GDP growth is a lie. The deal with Iran is the worst deal in history. Obamacare will raise your premiums more than 100% next year. The judge presiding over my case is Mexican. We're allowing thousands of refugees in from the Middle East without screening them. Illegal immigrants get better care than our military veterans. Hundreds of thousands of people are shot by illegal immigrants. More than 90% of people arrested are here illegally. We have the highest taxes in the world....sound familiar?
If we look for the reasons why Orwell’s dire presentiments threaten to become our everyday reality, we might consider the idea that Trump and his cohorts are reaping the benefits of the gradual (and, I would suggest, intentional) undermining and dismantling of our increasingly overcrowded and understaffed public education system. 
In school, we learn to distinguish truth from speculation, to value facts, to assess evidence, to evaluate information, to identify propaganda – to think. If what worried Orwell was widespread skepticism about our chances of writing history with any resemblance to the truth, how would he feel about a populace and a leadership that no longer values history at all, that has no respect for science, that believes the only subject worth pursuing is the how-to of uncontrolled capitalism?
How would we feel, or how do we feel? The GOP has been undermining science, education, and intelligence for years, especially since George W., when "truthiness" was born. It used to be common sense in this country that you seek the most qualified and educated people for their expertise on related studies, tasks, amd professions. Now, to know something about anything is "elitist" and how dare you think your "data" is more honest than my feelings

The biggest joke, though, and the most insidious lie, is that Trump and his people are guilty of everything they accuse others of being, only they are much, much worse. I can only hope the reality of his Presidency bullies some sense into the population, preferably before the world is destroyed.

15 December, 2016

The Digest—Thursday, 15 December, 2016

[The Digest is a collection of articles, videos, and other media I've viewed and found significant throughout the day. It is a way to divest myself from other social media that is more reliant on likes, click-bait, and peer-approval rather than quality, intelligence, and diversity of opinion, which are the qualities I find important. It is also a way to devote myself to daily contributions to this space...at least in theory.]

-=Summary: Trump's grodie Grill(e), TRUMP HATES vanity Fair, Arnie wants you to "stop whining," & The Prisoner=-

Articles:
Trump Grill Could Be the Worst Restaurant in America
Tina Nguyen from Vanity Fair

From the sound of it, the author was spot-on in saying that, "The allure of Trump’s restaurant, like the candidate, is that it seems like a cheap version of rich." And again:
If the cheeseburger is a quintessential part of America’s identity, Trump’s pledge to “make America great again” suddenly appeared not very promising. (Presumably, Trump’s Great America tastes like an M.S.G.-flavored kitchen sponge lodged between two other sponges.)
Brilliant. But what gets to the heart of the matter is, 
Perhaps Trump’s veneer of a steakhouse is too obviously a veneer, meant for the hoodied masses to visit once and never return. (There are already an infinite number of articles about how Trump’s mass-produced products are meant to impress a hollow sense of wealth.)
This is Trump all over, in everything, each ostentatiously gilded chair, each spray tan, cheating the government out of taxes and contractors out of pay, running for president—they are shoutouts to wealth and power, objects and activities and behavior meant to say, explicitly, I am rich and thus I am powerful and thus I can do anything I want so nyaaaahhhh, though the word "thus" is a bit complicated for him. 

Everything he does, everything he buys, every building he vandalizes with his name and tweet expelled to pollute the cybersphere is not an expression of wealth and power, but an expression meant to confer the perception of wealth and power. He really really really really wants everyone to know just how much wealth and power he has so that you will treat him like he's the wealthiest, most powerfulest perfect specimen of half-orangutang to have existed ever ever ever. 

The desperation and fragility of this construct is readily apparent in his hypervigilence toward criticism and the hysterical rage he ejaculates in response. The reason he thinks his daughter is such a hot "piece of ass" is not just about her looks, but that he played a role in her creation. 

More on Trump's ragefail below. 

14 December, 2016

The Digest—Wednesday, 14 December, 2016

[The Digest is a collection of articles, videos, and other media I've viewed and found significant throughout the day. It is a way to divest myself from other social media that is more reliant on likes, click-bait, and peer-approval rather than quality, intelligence, and diversity of opinion, which are the qualities I find important. It is also a way to devote myself to daily contributions to this space...at least in theory.]

-=Summary: Insomnia & The Prisoner=-

Articles:

I read nothing today.
I last slept Sunday night.
My brainz drool.

But I watched!...

TV/Film:

The Prisoner, episode 1

I love this show.
I am not a number! I am a free man!
Attack of the sentient man-eating weather balloons!
Be seeing you!

13 December, 2016

The Digest—Tuesday, 13 December, 2016

[The Digest is a collection of articles, videos, and other media I've viewed and found significant throughout the day. It is a way to divest myself from other social media that is more reliant on likes, click-bait, and peer-approval rather than quality, intelligence, and diversity of opinion, which are the qualities I find important. It is also a way to devote myself to daily contributions to this space...at least in theory.]

-=Summary: Asshole-in-Chief out-assholes himself with Perry pick, reasons why the Perry pick make such a prickly pecker, fight on, Trouble Every Day, & A Crime to Remember=-

Articles:

Rick Perry is Donald Trump's choice for energy secretary
Jeff Zeleny, Jim Acosta, and Theodore Schleifer from CNN

This may be the biggest dick move so far—nominating the guy who not only wanted to abolish the department he is now meant to run, but couldn't even remember the name of it during the debate.  He also wanted to abolish the Department of Education—education!!!!! To explain why it's such a dick move, here's a companion piece for context:

Rick Perry's War on Science
Tim Murphy from Mother Jones

Ah, yes. Rick Perry. It would be easy to dismiss him as benignly stupid if he weren't potentially so very, very dangerous, as all True Believers! are. He thinks climate change is a hoax perpetuated by scientists who are lying to make money. 98% of climate scientists in the world are in on this, apparently. This is a common argument, and it's so ridiculous it's almost impossible to refute, which is one of the reasons it works so well. He thinks so little of the profession he attempts to scientify himself:
In his 2010 book, Fed Up!, he wrote that "we have been experiencing a cooling trend" and railed against Democrats who have embraced "so-called science" on climate change.
Oh! Oh, Mr. Perry, sir, thank you so much! I thought years and years of the highest temperatures on record meant things were warming up! How silly of me! These are the people who stand in the street in the middle of winter and declare we're experiencing a "cooling trend" because we still have seasons. This expresses a complete and utter lack of both scientific understanding and the concept of context; that it is patterns and the accumulation of data that express "trends" and produce data. I'm guessing he prayed on it and God told him that numbers and facts and scientists are wicked tools of the devil not to be trusted. Ah, well.

But he gets worse:
As governor, Perry walked the walk. In 2011, my colleague Kate Sheppard (now with the Huffington Post) reported that Perry officials at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality had censored references to climate change in an official state report.
Yes, don't trust the scientists with the science, trust the politicians who know best. The same politicians who complain about government intrustion, and who are the first to scold anyone on opposing sides who dare to even comment on subjects outside of their professional expertise. No, science can be edited by political will because it is merely inconvenient. Pay no attention to the vested interests behind the curtain. 

12 December, 2016

The Digest—Monday, 12 December, 2016

[The Digest is a collection of articles, videos, and other media I've viewed and found significant throughout the day. It is a way to divest myself from other social media that is more reliant on likes, click-bait, and peer-approval rather than quality, intelligence, and diversity of opinion, which are the qualities I find important. It is also a way to devote myself to daily contributions to this space...at least in theory.]

-=Summary: Say farewell to mental health care, fighting censorship with...more censorship. Chris Christie vetoes reforms to the use of solitary confinement, Texas forces women to bury their fetuses, a few in the electoral college want to do their actual jobs, "The Soldier's Heart," & They Live=-

Articles:

The Mental Health Crisis in Trump’s America
Richard A. Friedman from The New York Times

As someone who only has health insurance because of Medicaid expansions under the Affordable Care Act, I am very concerned about this, too. My concern also stems from my studies as a future social worker, and—most crucially—as a human being who abhors the needless suffering of other human beings. I know what it's like to struggle with chronic conditions and no health insurance. I know what it's like to be treated as a failed commodity unworthy of something as essential as basic health care. 

Health care in this country is treated as a privilege, something you get if you're lucky enough to have full-time, non-contractor employment in this country, like a car and a house and other signals of wealth. Humans are not cars. Health insurance is vital to, well, health, which is vital to survival. It is also incredibly short-sighted to treat health coverage in this way, as the overall costs by the uninsured is astronomical. 

Unless Mr. Trump plans to replace Obamacare with universal coverage (hahahahahahahahahahahaha yeah right), he is telling the world, and especially U.S. citizens who can't afford private coverage or who have preexisting conditions, that they simply don't matter. That their health, and thus their survival, is irrelevant. I suspect this is what he thinks, what he feels, about anyone who can't make him a buck or flatter his vanity, so it will be unsurprising when he guts the ACA and thus revokes insurance for millions of people. 

It will still be a travesty, a tragic farce, a puppet show aping 3rd world politics in a supposed 1st world nation. Unsurprising, yes, but unconscionable all the same. 


11 December, 2016

The Digest—Sunday, 11 December, 2016

[The Digest is a collection of articles, videos, and other media I've viewed and found significant throughout the day. It is a way to divest myself from other social media that is more reliant on likes, click-bait, and peer-approval rather than quality, intelligence, and diversity of opinion, which are the qualities I find important. It is also a way to devote myself to daily contributions to this space...at least in theory.]

-=Summary: $$$ vs. Life, outrage over Russia?. the life-lens of Google, that Nabokov vs. editor book, Gloria Steinen glorious as usual, iZombie, & Hip Hop Evolution=-

Articles:

Stop Fixating on Economic Growth -- Let's Talk About Quality of Life
John de Graaf from Truthout

Trying to convince Americans that quality of life is separate from economic growth is an uphill battle; there's a reason the GOP treats issues like advertising cars & pimple cream & viagra. 

10 December, 2016

The Digest—Saturday, 10 December, 2016

[The Digest is a collection of articles, videos, and other media I've viewed and found significant throughout the day. It is a way to divest myself from other social media that is more reliant on likes, click-bait, and peer-approval rather than quality, intelligence, and diversity of opinion, which are the qualities I find important. It is also a way to devote myself to daily contributions to this space...at least in theory.]

-=Summary: Hexmas gift from the GOP, Fentanyl execs arrested. Texas forces women to read lies about abortion, Zizek thinks we're all evil and disgusting, William Gibson on the future, Cronenberg's Shivers, Vice News Tonight, and The Good Neighbor (felony murder, privacy, behavior, context, fluffy cats)=-

Articles:

Merry Christmas! Here’s a House Republican Plan to Cut Social Security.
Jim Newell from Slate

Go-go-Gadget Super Arsewipes! Surprised? Oh, it's going to get worse. 



09 December, 2016

The Digest—Friday, 9 December, 2016

[The Digest is a collection of articles, videos, and other media I've viewed and found significant throughout the day. It is a way to divest myself from other social media that is more reliant on likes, click-bait, and peer-approval rather than quality, intelligence, and diversity of opinion, which are the qualities I find important. It is also a way to devote myself to daily contributions to this space...at least in theory.]

-=Summary: What's fake news, the counted, Trump begins the purge, laughing at murder, keep out the gays, Ohio hates local government, saving the torture report, Glenn Beck has regrets, JunkyChicken-in-Chief, & Moon=-

Articles:

Stop worrying about fake news. What comes next will be much worse
Jonathan Albright from The Guardian

Why is the definition of fake news some big question? I'll tell you what fake news is: it's something reported as news that is, quite simply, not true. Like the news story that said the pope had endorsed Trump. That was not true, so it was fake news. Fake news doesn't apply to opinion pieces and pontifications about ideology and policy. 

This blog, for example, is not news, though it contains links to news stories. What I write is not news. It is opinion, diatribe, my own way of working out my feelings about all this shit. It is not fake, either. What I think and what I write might strike others as false and untrue because they disagree with my positions, but that doesn't make it fake news. 

If I posted something that invented a Trump quote, like, "Trump wants to place liberals in concentration camps!" (take that, Glenn Beck), that could be considered fake news, because it presents itself as being news, or at least newsworthy, even though it is (I hope) completely false, and I have no idea why anyone would believe I, alone, had access to such supposed "truth."  If I posted, instead, "The way Trump is treating people is like putting them in a concentration camp," I would be ridiculously insensitive and hyperbolic, but it's not fake news, just hysterical opinion. 

I agree with the author that curating articles to weed out unpopular opinions is unacceptable, but opinions and ideas are not, generally, news. Fake news is reporting as real things that are false, like the story that Clinton et al. are operating satanic pedophile rings out of pizza shops, or that the parents of Sandy Hook victims are just actors hired by evil liberals to push an anti-gun agenda, or that Obama was born in Kenya. These things are demonstrably false. They did not happen. THAT is fake news, and THAT is the kind of shit Trump and his ilk have repeatedly peddled. 

The mania over fake news is deserved. The soon-to-be Asshole-in-Chief and his upcoming cabinet and nominees and appointees are on record pushing fake news stories that heighten aggression, divisiveness, paranoia, and violence. The complete disregard for scientific fact and pursuit of customized "facts"-on-demand is so inherently insidious that everyone should be very concerned. 

Why there is any confusion over what "fake news" means is a total mystery to me, but then so is much of the last year.